No sponsorship, no affiliate links, no email capture. Pricing taken directly from vendor pages.
lmscost.com
RFP scaffoldVerified June 2026

LMS RFP Template

Most LMS RFPs leave too much room for vendors to quote in different shapes. This scaffold forces every vendor into the same answer format, so you can compare apples to apples.

Section 1

Programme scope and learner profile

Section 2

Billing model and active-user definition

Section 3

Functional requirements

Section 4

Integrations

Section 5

AI features, priced separately

Section 6

Implementation and ongoing services

Section 7

Commercial terms

How to score

A simple scoring matrix

Score on three axes: total three-year cost (subscription + implementation + content + integrations + AI uplift + projected renewal escalation under the cap clause), functional fit against the must-have list, and vendor risk (ownership, financial health, recent leadership churn, customer references at your scale). Weight cost at 30-40 percent, fit at 40-50 percent, risk at 10-20 percent. Avoid a single all-in number; the components matter.

Related

Where to use this

Mid-market LMS guide

Where most RFPs live (100-1,000 learners).

Enterprise LMS guide

Where RFPs become multi-stage procurement.

Hidden LMS costs

The cost lines the RFP must surface.

Quote-only trap

Why an RFP is the only price-discovery method.

Last verified June 2026. Vendor pricing changes without notice; see the sources page for the verification log.